Is Gazi Ashraf Hossain, the new chief selector of BCB or a technocrat director?
After Bangladesh Cricket Board President Nazmul Hasan announced in a press conference that Gazi Ashraf Hossain will be the chief selector for the national cricket team for the next two years, an experienced journalist commented. Given that Ashraf represented BCB in ICC meetings five or six times between 2007 and 2008 and that, in 2013, he served as a board director of BCB until Khaled Mahmud defeated him in an election to take his seat in the boardroom, Ashraf’s return was somewhat unexpected. His sole involvement with cricket was through writing a column for a major daily and going to talk shows or match analysis on T-Sports, a prominent sports channel in Bangladesh.
After losing the election, he rarely went to Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium or any other locations where competitive cricket was played under BCB’s sponsorship. Even though Hossain is anticipated to be a member of the BCB cricket operation committee, Hossain’s appointment was so unexpected that Khaled Mahmud, vice-president of BCB cricket operations, openly declared he was unaware of the development.
“I found it completely unexpected. His name escaped my ears. Numerous rumors and names were present. In the M A Aziz Stadium in Chattogram on February 13, Mahmud told reporters, “I’m the vice-chairman of cricket operations, so I didn’t know anything, so it was really shocking for me.” Jalal Yunus, the chairman of BCB cricket operations, informed Cricbuzz that Hossain’s appointment was completely private due to BCB boss Nazmul choosing the chief selector. This was in response to Mahmud’s outburst.
“Our president was handling the situation and asked Siraj (Enayet Husain) to speak with Ashraf after the name of Ashraf was suggested during the board meeting. Following Ashraf’s acceptance of the position, Papon (Nazmul) bhai made the decision to suggest the name during the board meeting. Sujon (Khaled Mahmud) was unaware of this for the same reason, and this also applied to the other board directors, Jalal clarified. Given that there was no opportunity to bring up the name of another person for the position of chief selector, a number of board directors expressed their shock and surprise to this website in an anonymous statement following the events of the board directors meeting on January 12. “I think he( Ashraf) is responsible only to our president of the board and to some extent Siraj bhai as they are those who appointed him earlier and took our approval later,” a director of the BCB said.
“Aside from the pay role structure, he (Ashraf) will be enjoying a lot of facilities that are enjoyed by the board director, but you can certainly not claim that he is just a chief selector,” he stated. He also added that, given Hossain’s expected power, he was unsure of how things would work out with head coach Chandika Hathurusingha in the selection panel meeting. Hossain will not be using the chief selector’s exclusive amenities, BCB Chief Executive Nizamuddin Chowdhury acknowledged.
Given his background and social standing, Hossain will receive benefits comparable to those of the other board directors because he was previously a member of the BCB board. On Wednesday (February 14), the prominent Bengali Daily Prothom Alo quoted Nizamuddin as saying, “But in accordance with the designation, he will be replacing the former chief selector.”
Since they are not paid by the board to carry out their duties, BCB directors serve primarily as volunteers. However, if a director travels overseas while carrying out any BCB-related duties, he receives a daily allowance of $500 USD (which includes hotel costs), travel expenses (which may include business class airfare), 25 complimentary tickets in various classes for each match during any domestic or international series, and an honorarium for attending board meetings.
Former BCB director Dewan Shafiul Arefin Tutul responded sharply when questions about selector privileges versus board director privileges were raised regarding the Hossain appointment process.”A board director’s and selector’s facilities are unrelated. The amount of activity, including what privileges and daily and travel allowances (DA) board directors will receive, is not expressly stated in the constitution. It isn’t stated in the constitution, and it can change based on HR (Human Resource) policy. The board’s constitution doesn’t directly address it either. Depending on whether they travel first class or executive, a director may receive 500, 200, or 300 dollars, depending on the board’s decision. Selectors and other members can also make changes based on executive decisions made by the board, as stated by Shafiul in a statement to Cricbuzz on Wednesday. This is because it is not stated in the Constitution.
“But it is incorrect to say that he will have access to all board director facilities as he is essentially a contract employee. No one can guarantee that he will receive all the amenities that the board director does, he contended. He can have an agreement that states in writing that you might receive $500 or even $1,000.
The board director’s powers are unassignable by the constitution to any other person. If someone is using all of the board director’s amenities without actually serving as a board director, you must include that in the constituency. However, he may have additional facilities with a separate agreement. He stated, “You can choose them because our constitution specifies that you can have ten percent technocrat ministers.”
Final Thought
The arrangement of Gazi Ashraf Hossain as the chief selector for the Bangladesh national cricket group has blended a impressive sum of astonish and discussion inside the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) and among cricket devotees. The choice, which was closely overseen and uncovered by BCB president Nazmul Hasan, highlights the complexities and complexities of cricket organization in Bangladesh. The need of straightforwardness and communication inside the board, as prove by the astonish and ignorance of key figures such as Khaled Mahmud, raises questions almost the administration and decision-making forms inside the BCB. Besides, the benefits and offices expanded to Hossain, paralleling those of a board chief, emphasize a broader talk about approximately the parts, duties, and compensations of people inside cricket’s regulatory bodies. The refinement between the parts of a selector and a board executive, as laid out by previous BCB executive Dewan Shafiul Arefin Tutul, demonstrates a require for clearer approaches and rules to guarantee reasonableness and straightforwardness inside the organization. This situation too reflects on the control flow and the impact of individual associations inside the cricket organization in Bangladesh. Whereas Hossain’s involvement and past commitments to cricket in Bangladesh are evident, the way of his arrangement and the consequent benefits he is anticipated to appreciate have driven to dialogs around responsibility, meritocracy, and the generally administration structure of the BCB.
